I immediately knew that I had to delve a bit deeper into this town for my blog this week, as Celebration has always held a creepy sort of fascination for me. I have visited the town several times during family trips to Disney World, and have heard stories about the rigidity of their homeowner rules, town appearance, and general way of living. Here is more information on the town, for those who are interested. The town was originally conceptualized as an extenuation of Walt Disney’s idea of the Experimental Prototype Communities of Tomorrow (EPCOT). I didn’t realize that it was also attempting to fall into the “new urban” category, as well. As the book points out, a main reason why it fails to qualify as a new urban town is that it doesn’t incorporate one of the major functions that a new urban town is designed to address: transportation. The town is connected directly to the Disney parks and resorts by World Drive, but residents would still need to drive about ten minutes to get there. It also does not connect in any sustainable way to the outlying roads and highways of Kissimmee. The town is a relatively exclusive, separate entity from the rest of the city, which violates the concept of community planning and urban organization that new urbanism strives to achieve. Compared to this example of San Jose's future city development plans, taken from the Smart Growth America website, Celebration is fairly wide of the mark. Although it is easy for the residents to move throughout the town itself on foot, bike, etc., it is necessary for them to drive virtually any time they want to venture out for work and other activities. The town has been recognized by some in the community to be designed to meet some of the new urban specifications by incorporating different housing types throughout the town, and staying open to people with varying levels of income, but it is still not known for maintaining a consistent base of affordable housing that would contribute to the ‘lasting’ community feel. Upon first opening, it was named the “new community of the year” in 2001 by the Urban Land Institute; however, the overall effect of the town has more to do with Disney’s visualization to make history with the continuation of the Disney brand, and less to do with a conscientious effort to establish an urban town within the larger city that facilitates effective land use, social capital, and transportation diversity. Not to mention, it’s just creepy! As visually appealing as I have found the town when I’ve visited, it’s equally eerie; the Stepford Wives analogy is great in relaying its perfect creepiness. You walk down the main street (which is called Market Street instead of Main Street, because apparently there’s already a Main Street in Kissimmee, and there can’t be duplicate street names in the same city…), and you’re almost bowled over by the quaint, Disney-esqueness of it all. It’s almost identical to walking down Main Street at the Magic Kingdom. While that is desirable and expected when you’re visiting a theme park, its translation to an actual town is a bit disconcerting. Also, I learned from the Wikipedia link that throughout autumn and during holiday events, the lampposts along Market Street are rigged to spurt leaf-shaped confetti and synthetic snow to emulate the seasons. Whaaaaaaat? That is just damn creepy!!! So, now you all know my feelings on the town… and yet, during all my shuddering and gawking as I’ve walked through the town, I still have a *slight* desire to live there someday. It’s just so perfect, and quaint… I would be a perfect candidate for brainwashing, I think. Regardless of what you think of the town, it stands as an example of what can be achieved by visionaries in the architectural, business, and development fields… but in terms of qualifying for the new urbanism stamp, it has some re-developing to do.
Monday, October 31, 2011
Celebration, FL: Creepytown, USA
So this week’s Roseland reading talked about new urbanism as one component of land use and urban form. New urbanism is a great concept, based on the idea of re-organizing urban areas to make them more inclusive, complete, and neighborly for residents. Along with the many examples they give of new urban designs in the textbook, they mention some failed attempts at the concept that have drawn public criticism. One example they give is that of the unincorporated town of Celebration, in Kissimmee, FL. Some pics:




I immediately knew that I had to delve a bit deeper into this town for my blog this week, as Celebration has always held a creepy sort of fascination for me. I have visited the town several times during family trips to Disney World, and have heard stories about the rigidity of their homeowner rules, town appearance, and general way of living. Here is more information on the town, for those who are interested. The town was originally conceptualized as an extenuation of Walt Disney’s idea of the Experimental Prototype Communities of Tomorrow (EPCOT). I didn’t realize that it was also attempting to fall into the “new urban” category, as well. As the book points out, a main reason why it fails to qualify as a new urban town is that it doesn’t incorporate one of the major functions that a new urban town is designed to address: transportation. The town is connected directly to the Disney parks and resorts by World Drive, but residents would still need to drive about ten minutes to get there. It also does not connect in any sustainable way to the outlying roads and highways of Kissimmee. The town is a relatively exclusive, separate entity from the rest of the city, which violates the concept of community planning and urban organization that new urbanism strives to achieve. Compared to this example of San Jose's future city development plans, taken from the Smart Growth America website, Celebration is fairly wide of the mark. Although it is easy for the residents to move throughout the town itself on foot, bike, etc., it is necessary for them to drive virtually any time they want to venture out for work and other activities. The town has been recognized by some in the community to be designed to meet some of the new urban specifications by incorporating different housing types throughout the town, and staying open to people with varying levels of income, but it is still not known for maintaining a consistent base of affordable housing that would contribute to the ‘lasting’ community feel. Upon first opening, it was named the “new community of the year” in 2001 by the Urban Land Institute; however, the overall effect of the town has more to do with Disney’s visualization to make history with the continuation of the Disney brand, and less to do with a conscientious effort to establish an urban town within the larger city that facilitates effective land use, social capital, and transportation diversity. Not to mention, it’s just creepy! As visually appealing as I have found the town when I’ve visited, it’s equally eerie; the Stepford Wives analogy is great in relaying its perfect creepiness. You walk down the main street (which is called Market Street instead of Main Street, because apparently there’s already a Main Street in Kissimmee, and there can’t be duplicate street names in the same city…), and you’re almost bowled over by the quaint, Disney-esqueness of it all. It’s almost identical to walking down Main Street at the Magic Kingdom. While that is desirable and expected when you’re visiting a theme park, its translation to an actual town is a bit disconcerting. Also, I learned from the Wikipedia link that throughout autumn and during holiday events, the lampposts along Market Street are rigged to spurt leaf-shaped confetti and synthetic snow to emulate the seasons. Whaaaaaaat? That is just damn creepy!!! So, now you all know my feelings on the town… and yet, during all my shuddering and gawking as I’ve walked through the town, I still have a *slight* desire to live there someday. It’s just so perfect, and quaint… I would be a perfect candidate for brainwashing, I think. Regardless of what you think of the town, it stands as an example of what can be achieved by visionaries in the architectural, business, and development fields… but in terms of qualifying for the new urbanism stamp, it has some re-developing to do.
I immediately knew that I had to delve a bit deeper into this town for my blog this week, as Celebration has always held a creepy sort of fascination for me. I have visited the town several times during family trips to Disney World, and have heard stories about the rigidity of their homeowner rules, town appearance, and general way of living. Here is more information on the town, for those who are interested. The town was originally conceptualized as an extenuation of Walt Disney’s idea of the Experimental Prototype Communities of Tomorrow (EPCOT). I didn’t realize that it was also attempting to fall into the “new urban” category, as well. As the book points out, a main reason why it fails to qualify as a new urban town is that it doesn’t incorporate one of the major functions that a new urban town is designed to address: transportation. The town is connected directly to the Disney parks and resorts by World Drive, but residents would still need to drive about ten minutes to get there. It also does not connect in any sustainable way to the outlying roads and highways of Kissimmee. The town is a relatively exclusive, separate entity from the rest of the city, which violates the concept of community planning and urban organization that new urbanism strives to achieve. Compared to this example of San Jose's future city development plans, taken from the Smart Growth America website, Celebration is fairly wide of the mark. Although it is easy for the residents to move throughout the town itself on foot, bike, etc., it is necessary for them to drive virtually any time they want to venture out for work and other activities. The town has been recognized by some in the community to be designed to meet some of the new urban specifications by incorporating different housing types throughout the town, and staying open to people with varying levels of income, but it is still not known for maintaining a consistent base of affordable housing that would contribute to the ‘lasting’ community feel. Upon first opening, it was named the “new community of the year” in 2001 by the Urban Land Institute; however, the overall effect of the town has more to do with Disney’s visualization to make history with the continuation of the Disney brand, and less to do with a conscientious effort to establish an urban town within the larger city that facilitates effective land use, social capital, and transportation diversity. Not to mention, it’s just creepy! As visually appealing as I have found the town when I’ve visited, it’s equally eerie; the Stepford Wives analogy is great in relaying its perfect creepiness. You walk down the main street (which is called Market Street instead of Main Street, because apparently there’s already a Main Street in Kissimmee, and there can’t be duplicate street names in the same city…), and you’re almost bowled over by the quaint, Disney-esqueness of it all. It’s almost identical to walking down Main Street at the Magic Kingdom. While that is desirable and expected when you’re visiting a theme park, its translation to an actual town is a bit disconcerting. Also, I learned from the Wikipedia link that throughout autumn and during holiday events, the lampposts along Market Street are rigged to spurt leaf-shaped confetti and synthetic snow to emulate the seasons. Whaaaaaaat? That is just damn creepy!!! So, now you all know my feelings on the town… and yet, during all my shuddering and gawking as I’ve walked through the town, I still have a *slight* desire to live there someday. It’s just so perfect, and quaint… I would be a perfect candidate for brainwashing, I think. Regardless of what you think of the town, it stands as an example of what can be achieved by visionaries in the architectural, business, and development fields… but in terms of qualifying for the new urbanism stamp, it has some re-developing to do.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I used to live in Kissimee, Fl actually; I left long before Celebration was built, but it makes me wonder what else has Kissimme done in the ways of new urbanism? Are there are actual areas that have been developed more appropriately, or do they seem to just piggyback off of Celebration?
ReplyDeleteI found a really good article online that delves into the failures of Celebration in terms of New Urbanism. It describes the three components of the movement as: developing a sense of place, provision of reliable government services, AND creation of potential employment for the inhabitants.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.newgeography.com/content/00370-new-urbanism%E2%80%99s-economic-achilles-heel
The reason Celebration failed is that it focused on the image more than the content of New Urbanism (to be expected for a town created to reflect the Image and Likeness of God-er, Disney). Unfortunately, New Urbanism (much like other aspects of sustainability) has a definite potential for greenwashing, which is exactly what happened in Celebration. The fact that the people working at the local Publix had to commute in since they couldn't afford to live ANYWHERE in town, shows that the real goal in planning was to create a "hip" place for rich people. Not an environmentally responsible, socioeconomically diverse living space, which is the true basis of New Urbanism.
I had not idea EPCOT stood for Experimental Prototype Communities of Tomorrow. This is a perfect example of "island" new urbanism...and it definitely relates to the many examples we can find of the various uses for the words "green" and "sustainable." When you get to the root of many thing they use the name, but don't necessarily incorporate the ideas and philosophies into every component of a design and that is what it takes to actually make it work! By the way, there are a ton of pretty cool projects and concepts highlighted on the New Urbanism website (http://www.newurbanism.org/).
ReplyDeleteA good friend of mine used to work as a landscape architect for DPZ, who seem to be leading the way in new urbanist designs (http://www.dpz.com)
Okay thats all for now. Thank you for the post!
Not going to lie, reading about Celebration and seeing pictures makes it seem so appealing. However after learning about how it's tried to appeal to the 'new urbanism' movement and failed, I can't seem to get myself to like it as much. Did the architects and urban planners just forget to make the town more connected to Kissimee or was this a strategic move on their part? It seems that maybe Disney wanted Celebration to act as it's own separate entity. It would be interesting to meet with them and hear about their original intentions for the town and their thoughts on how sustainable community experts have coined it a failed attempt.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the kind of creepiness of the town. It makes me think of The Truman Show. The fake seasonal forcing is just weird. The town sounds to me like a good idea in theory, but it wasn't well executed. They do have good components (connection to Disney) but not good execution (having to drive to it). I wonder if they spent some time upgrading their existing town, they could make it fit into new urbanism. I hope they would be willing to.
ReplyDeleteFirst off, appreciate the shout out to my hometown of San Jose. I don't get many opportunities to check in with the "motherland" as I call it, but I do gather that it's trying to do things mostly right.
ReplyDeleteSecond, I too think Celebration looks pretty weird, but then again, I am inherently distrustful of anything having to do with Disney. North Carolina (where I lived before coming to Bloomington) seems to have become a hub of these planned communities. Some are in good locations; others aren't. Southern Village (http://www.southernvillage.com/index.htm) and Meadowmont (http://www.meadowmont.com/) at least are on transportation corridors with bus and bike access to stuff people need, but Meadowmont in particular is a big sprawling place. Though it does have lots of green space, I don't think it would quite measure up to the standards of New Urbanist philosophy.
I definitely agree with Nikki on the thought "that maybe Disney wanted Celebration to act as it's own separate entity." Anything that Disney meddles with is typically for it's own enrichment. And, even though it actually looks kinda cool, to me, I have inherent distrust for anything that is too-well organized. Not that organization is inherently bad, just the traditional conception of linearity that organization tends to connote. If the organization was more organic (connected, less forced) then it might be more appealing. And, yes, seeing a lamppost "spurt" anything would creep me out for sure...especially things as unsustainable as whatever (likely toxic) materials spew-forth to represent winter and fall. Blech.
ReplyDeleteHumm... yes, Celebration reminds me of the movie The Stepford Wives, where there is a secret society within this "prefect" neighborhood. Although, honestly, I'm a bit worried Celebration might eventually turn into a ghost town full of beautiful rundown houses and no people. Which would be creepier? I'm not sure, but I'm pretty sure that neither would be sustainable..
ReplyDeletePerhaps after its heyday the area can once again be transformed, but this time into something more practical and Eco-friendly. See transformation: http://sustainablecitiescollective.com/kaidbenfield/26069/can-dead-suburban-mall-be-transformed-something-better-its-complicated
Hey Keelyn - Before reading the Roseland reference, I had no idea that this place existed. After reading your blog, I was reminded of one of the movies we watched in class in which the speaker made a reference to the suburbs as "soulless." I cannot think of any better term to describe Celebration.
ReplyDelete