Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Fishery Management Strategies

Our Roseland reading on community economic development this week really struck a chord with me, especially one of the last lines of the chapter:  “In a commodity-intensive economy, people are compelled to seek full-time employment and an increasing income, but some people are making a shift.  By re-evaluating their needs and wants and realizing that their true demands are for comfort, security, health, and happiness, some people are finding alternative ways to satisfy these demands” (Roseland, pg. 183).  Not to be overly simplistic or maudlin, but for me, this little paragraph is really what life boils down to: the desire and the need, as human beings, to feel secure, happy, and healthy in their lives.  Everything else is just window dressing, as they say. 

Onto my blog topic… as I was reading, I was very impressed with the number of different ways people have found to utilize resources, time, and money to secure better, stable, and sustainable communities.  More specifically, the section on community forestry, fisheries and agriculture exemplifies the impact that a group of committed individuals can have on the direct operation of their economies, environments, and resources.  The short blurb about fishing quotas is something that I have had occasion to research for another class, and also read a book about over the summer.  Not sure if anybody’s read this one: 

It’s a great mix of fishery science, management, and local anecdotes (having to do specifically with Maine lobsters, but the same concepts apply).  The importance of establishing fishing quotas for local fisherman is just one of the themes explored in the book, as the over-fishing of lobsters and other fish can rapidly reduce population, and lead to extinction of species, as well as economic crisis.  Not to mention other problems related to bad fishing practices, like lots of by-catch (other fish and sea animals that die when they get caught in fishing nets),  pollution and dumping from fishing gear and boats, economic waste, and population dynamics shifts in different species of fish. 



More pertinent to this week’s discussion, however, are the different strategies that can be used to ensure proper fishing rights and cooperative fishing initiatives amongst stakeholders in areas that rely heavily on the ocean’s resources.  Roseland mentions the need to “establish community quotas whereby fishing rights are allocated to communities, and distributed in turn to local fishers” (pg. 180).  Related to this, I came across another article that focuses more specifically on management strategies that can be implemented to protect against overharvesting and control the amounts of fish caught in different markets (termed incentive blocking and incentive adjusting measures, respectively).  Some of the strategies mentioned are limited entry and buyback programs, gear and vessel restrictions, total allowable catches, vessel catch limits, and individual effort quotas.  The article goes into detail about each of these, for those who are interested. 
The end goal of programs that initiate these types of strategies is to change the current management systems in place in fisheries from those of economically and environmentally wasteful practices, to those of self-sustaining fish populations and cooperative fishing programs.  Just as in forestry policies, agricultural cooperatives, and countless other efforts and examples of communities working together towards more sustainable natural systems that provide for their needs, the fishing industry illustrates the absolute necessity of having a management system in place to ensure that resources are being allocated appropriately. 

7 comments:

  1. Have you seen the documentary, "The Cove"? http://www.thecovemovie.com/ If not and if you are interested in fisheries, I highly recommend it. I'm not going to lie, it will break your heart. I ended up finishing a bottle of wine (prior to pregnancy of course)and in tear. But, it opens your eyes to some of the terrible things happening in the world and inspires you to take action!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent post Keelyn! The fisheries conundrum is a prime example of the push and pull between sustainable and economic development. I always see so many progressive, and well-thought out management strategies for sustainable fishing, many of which you so wonderfully cited. However (and maybe this is just my own ignorance on the topic) where do we put all these out-of-work fishermen/women?

    No matter how you cut it, sustainable fishing requires less catch overall (for now at least to let populations rebound). This means we need less people to do it...unless we go back to netting them from the shore (low-tech=more labor intensive, which I tweeted about). What do we have these people do for income in the meantime? And then I found a REALLY good article on this very topic... http://www.edf.org/oceans/catch-shares-save-commercial-fishing-jobs

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is kind of crazy have many times and in how many classes I have heard about fisheries this semester. I had never given any thought to them before but they are apparently a big issue because of common pool resources and tragedy of the commons and all that stuff. So many people along the coasts rely on fishing as their only income, but at some point they starting taking out more fish than can be sustainably regenerated. It is also really difficult to regulate the fishing industry because the fishermen (and women) are mobile and sometimes even fish during the dead of night to elude regulators who are monitoring their practices. I am a big fan of certification programs, and so I try to buy fish that has been certified in hopes that my eating habits do not contribute to the destruction of fisheries and in turn, their ecosystems.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've gotten a glimpse into fisheries management in both Natural Resource Management and Sustainable Development. Some fisheries are already collapsing due to over-fishing. Not a good situation. The catch share article is interesting, and illustrates the idea that market-based solutions are the best way to resolve the problem. And at this point, if fisheries are already crashing and people are already losing jobs, why not try it?

    ReplyDelete
  5. good blog, keelyn! this is definitely an issue. For all you fish lovers out there or all the peope who have recently been turned on to this, let me plug also that shrimperies are also causing major environmental and economic damages because of there destrution of mangroves. If anyone would like more on this topic, I had to write/have written a lit review on a cost benefit analysis of this condundrum for my class this semester. give me a another week and you can read my review or i can send you the articles i used.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for the comments! Laura, I have not seen The Cove, on purpose, after hearing how horrible and sad it is :(. I know that hiding your head in the sand won't help matters, but I just haven't been able to bring myself to watch it. However, having worked at an aquarium for the past four years before starting grad school full time, I have learned A LOT about these types of issues, so I use the fact that I'm probably more "in-the-know" about these things than the average person as an excuse to put off watching it. I felt terrible after I watched Food Inc., but you're right- it's vital information to know, and it's largely hidden from common public view. That's how these horrible things are able to continue... but that's also the great thing about becoming aware of them. The more people that know about it, sob while downing a bottle of wine, and are inclined to take action, the less they're going to be able to get away with things.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Holiday to do list: Read The Secret Life of Lobsters, watch The Cove (the trailer gave me the chills).

    Past civilizations, according to Diamond, have collapsed as a result of failing to preserve the regenerative capacity of the natural systems that kept them thriving. Will we ever learn?

    ReplyDelete